Comparative Study of Three Solar Drying Methods of Adensonia digitate L. (Baobab Leaves using Drying Kinetics and Empirical Drying Models)

Okaiyeto, S. A. and Oji, Nathaniel and Unguwanrimi, Y. A. (2021) Comparative Study of Three Solar Drying Methods of Adensonia digitate L. (Baobab Leaves using Drying Kinetics and Empirical Drying Models). Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 20 (8). pp. 77-85. ISSN 2582-2926

[thumbnail of 463-Article Text-775-1-10-20221007.pdf] Text
463-Article Text-775-1-10-20221007.pdf - Published Version

Download (501kB)

Abstract

A comparative study of three drying methods of baobab leaves have been conducted and reported. Mixed mode solar drying, indirect mode solar drying and open sun drying of baobab leaves were conducted based on three drying models viz a viz Lewis,. Page and Henderson and Pabis models were employed in this research. Baobab leaves dried faster when dried under the mixed mode on-farm solar dryer. Drying time reduced considerably using the mixed mode on-farm solar dryer. Drying data were fitted into Lewis, Page and Henderson and Pabis models. Henderson and Pabis model (R2=0.9999, 0.9611, 0.9656; X2= 1.0297, 0.7931, 0.7710; RMSE= 0.5859, 0.6898, 0.6802 and MBE= -0.4.135, -0.4.231, -0.4176) gave the best prediction for the mixed mode drying). In the same way Henderson and Pabis model (R2=0.7450, 0.7699, 0.8243; X2= 1.9025, 0.4026, 0.2006; RMSE= 1.0684, 0.5181, 0.4058 and MBE= -0.8966, -0.3823, 0.2789) gave the best prediction for the indirect mode drying of baobab leaves. Effective moisture diffusivity of baobab leaves varied between -6.382 X 10-04 and -1.108 X 10-03 m2/s.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: East India library > Engineering
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email support@eastindialibrary.com
Date Deposited: 04 Feb 2023 07:23
Last Modified: 31 Jul 2024 13:44
URI: http://info.paperdigitallibrary.com/id/eprint/127

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item